Clay,which was just below the surface of soil in certain clay-rich areas has to be dug up by a digger.对于这个句子后半部分的has to be的结构不明白, 为什么可以这样用语法结构? 它的意思是主语也是clay,但这样直接

来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:作业帮 时间:2024/05/07 11:12:45
Clay,which was just below the surface of soil in certain clay-rich areas has to be dug up by a digger.对于这个句子后半部分的has to be的结构不明白,  为什么可以这样用语法结构? 它的意思是主语也是clay,但这样直接

Clay,which was just below the surface of soil in certain clay-rich areas has to be dug up by a digger.对于这个句子后半部分的has to be的结构不明白, 为什么可以这样用语法结构? 它的意思是主语也是clay,但这样直接
Clay,which was just below the surface of soil in certain clay-rich areas has to be dug up by a digger.对于这个句子后半部分的has to be的结构不明白, 为什么可以这样用语法结构? 它的意思是主语也是clay,但这样直接在上个句子前加has to be dug up无法理解其逻辑

Clay,which was just below the surface of soil in certain clay-rich areas has to be dug up by a digger.对于这个句子后半部分的has to be的结构不明白, 为什么可以这样用语法结构? 它的意思是主语也是clay,但这样直接
被动句.be 过去分词.被挖.